Comment: "The polis exists by nature and that it is prior to the individual." (2002)
Was politics invented through a contract, or are we born to be political? 🤔 Dive into Aristotle's powerful idea of the polis as a natural institution, not a man-made agreement. Discover how his theory challenges modern liberalism, connects to communitarian thinkers like Sandel and Nussbaum, and even echoes in India’s Gram Sabha system.
PSIR
8/4/20252 min read
Aristotle, in his classic work Politics, famously stated that “Man is by nature a political animal” (zoon politikon). But this wasn’t just a poetic line—it formed the core of his political theory, which sees the polis (city-state) as a natural and essential structure of human life.
Unlike modern social contract thinkers like Hobbes, Locke, or Rousseau, who see the state as an artificial creation to escape chaos, Aristotle argues that the polis naturally evolves—from the household ➡️ to the village ➡️ to the city-state. It is the telos (highest purpose) of human association.
🔍 Three Priorities of Polis in Aristotle's Thought
1️⃣ Logical Priority:
Justice, citizenship, and virtue only make sense within a political community.
2️⃣ Temporal Priority:
Political institutions came before any notion of an independent individual.
3️⃣ Ontological Priority:
Humans become truly human only in political life. An isolated person, for Aristotle, is either a beast or a god, not a human being.
🔁 Aristotle vs Modern Liberalism: A Fundamental Clash
Modern political theory, especially liberalism, centers on the individual:
John Rawls: Justice emerges from individual choice behind a “veil of ignorance.”
Robert Nozick: Prioritizes individual rights over collective goals.
Aristotle disagrees. For him, the community comes first. Politics isn’t just about power or contracts—it’s about living well together.
📚 Modern Echoes of Aristotle: Communitarians & Capabilities
Aristotle's ideas inspire many contemporary thinkers:
Michael Sandel & Alasdair MacIntyre: Say modern liberalism ignores the social context that shapes individuals.
Amartya Sen & Martha Nussbaum: In their Capabilities Approach, argue that individual well-being requires political and social support—an Aristotelian idea at heart.
🇮🇳 Indian Context: Aristotle & Gram Sabha?
Aristotle believed in deliberative politics—discussion and moral reasoning among citizens.
In India, this finds resonance in Gram Sabhas, Panchayati Raj, and local participatory planning, where politics is not elite-driven but community-based.
🚨 Critiques of Aristotle: The Missing Voices
Despite his brilliance, Aristotle’s theory isn’t flawless:
❌ Excluded women, slaves, and non-Greeks from political participation.
❌ Claimed his model was universal, ignoring cultural and historical diversity.
Feminists and multicultural scholars point out that true democracy needs inclusion, not just virtue or structure.
🌐 New Politics, New Polis: Can Aristotle Adapt?
Today, we live in a networked society:
🌍 Global governance
💻 Digital democracy
🌐 Transnational citizenship
These challenge Aristotle’s idea of the bounded city-state. But his core idea—that politics is moral activity aiming at the common good—still holds weight.
🧭 Conclusion: Why Aristotle Still Matters
Aristotle reminds us that politics isn’t optional—it’s how we grow, belong, and live fully. Even in the age of algorithms and AI, political alienation and democratic fatigue can be countered by reviving his vision of civic virtue, shared responsibility, and ethical public life.
✅ His institutions may need updating, but his insight into human nature and community remains timeless.
Also See